Hidden blood loss in unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the hidden blood loss (HBL) and its possible risk factors after unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty (UOCL) in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2018 and March 2023, a total of 105 patients (55 males, 50 females; median age: 76 years; range, 52 to 93 years) who underwent C3-7 UOCL for MCSM were retrospectively analyzed. Data of the patients were recorded, including age, sex, height, weight, plasma albumin, blood glucose, hematocrit, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical time, and intraoperative blood loss. The HBL was calculated according to the Sehat formula, and risk factors were identified. RESULTS: The median surgical time was 180.7 min. The median total blood loss (TBL) and median HBL were 507.4 mL and 201.7 mL, respectively. Correlation analyses revealed that body mass index and surgical time were correlated with HBL (p<0.05). However, multiple linear regression analysis showed that HBL was positively correlated with surgical time (ß=0.293, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that surgical time is an independent risk factor for HBL. Therefore, HBL should not be overlooked in patients with MCSM undergoing UOCL, particularly in the patients with expected long surgical time.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF. RESULTS: Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF. CONCLUSIONS: In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation.

Surgical Outcomes of Extensive Dome-Like Laminoplasty Using En Bloc Resection of C2 Inner Lamina for Patients With Severe Cord Compression Behind C2 Body.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly developed extensive dome-like laminoplasty using en bloc resection of the C2 inner lamina in patients with severe cord compression behind the C2 body. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A surgery for severe cord compression behind C2 body is challenging for spinal surgeons. To date, there has been no established solution for severe cord compression behind the C2 body. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with severe cord compression behind the C2 body who underwent posterior surgery consecutively were enrolled. Extensive dome-like laminoplasty that was newly developed was performed to remove en bloc removal of the C2 inner lamina were performed. Preoperative and postoperative canal diameters behind the C2 and mean removed area of the C2 inner lamina were measured using MRI and CT scan. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed preoperative and postoperative periods. In addition, perioperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients underwent extensive dome-like laminoplasty and their diagnoses were ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL, 66.7%) and congenital stenosis with spondylosis (33.3%). The mean canal diameter behind the C2 increased from 9.85 (2.28) mm preoperatively to 19.91 (3.93) mm at the last follow-up ( P <0.001). Clinically, neck and arm visual analog scale, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and neck disability index significantly improved at postoperative 1 month ( P <0.05), and the scores were maintained until the last follow-up. No meaningful radiographic changes occurred after the surgeries. During the procedures, there were no particular complications, but one patient showed deteriorated myelopathic symptoms and underwent additional C1-C2 decompressive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After extensive dome-like laminoplasty, surgical outcomes are satisfactory, and complications are rare. This technique may be a viable option for patients with severe cord compression behind the C2 body. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty versus lateral mass screw fixation in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare cervical sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty(CL) and those undergoing lateral mass screw fixation(LMS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 67 patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine who underwent lateral mass screw fixation (LMS = 36) and cervical laminoplasty (CL = 31). We analyzed cervical sagittal parameters (C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, C7 slope (C7s), T1 slope (T1s), and spino-cranial angle (SCA)) and clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], neck disability index [NDI], Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores, recovery rate (RR), and minimum clinically significant difference [MCID]). The cervical sagittal parameters at the last follow-up were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Finally, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical sagittal parameters and each clinical outcome at the last follow-up after surgery in both groups. RESULTS: At the follow-up after posterior decompression in both groups, the mean values of C2-C7 SVA, C7s, and T1s in the LMS group were more significant than those in the CL group (P ≤ 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, C2-C7 SVA, T1s, and SCA gradually increased, and the C2-C7 Cobb angle gradually decreased after surgery (P < 0.05). The improvement in the JOA score and the recovery rate was similar between the two groups, while the improvement in the VAS-N score and NDI score was more significant in the CL group (P = 0.001; P = 0.043). More patients reached MCID in the CL group than in the LMS group (P = 0.036). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that SCA was independently associated with whether patients reached MCID at NDI postoperatively. SCA was positively correlated with cervical NDI and negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05); C2-7 Cobb angle was negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CL may be superior to LMS in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by OPLL. In addition, smaller cervical SCA after posterior decompression may suggest better postoperative outcomes.

Comparison of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) and laminoplasty treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with developmental canal stenosis: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical effectiveness and radiologic results of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) comparing with laminoplasty (LP) in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) with developmental canal stenosis (DCS). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 41 patients who had MCSM with DCS treated with ACDF or LP from December 2018 to April 2023. Patients were split into ACDF and LP groups for comparison, and patients were further separated into subgroups based on whether or not a reserving canal space was present. The operation time, hemoglobin, hospital stay, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to assess clinical efficacy. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and cervical range of motion were applied to evaluate imaging changes. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients, 19 received ACDF, and 22 received LP. At the final follow-up, both groups' mJOA scores significantly improved, and the intercomparison showed no differences; the VAS score was much lower in the ACDF group but remained unchanged in the LP group. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 Cobb angle and T1 slope had significantly increased in the ACDF group, while the LP group showed no change; the cervical range of motion had significantly decreased in both groups, with the ACDF group exhibiting a more marked reduction. Within the ACDF subgroup, there was no postoperative symptom improvement for those with reserving space, whereas there was postoperative symptom resolution for those with non-reserving space; however, postoperative symptom in the LP subgroup was resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACDF and LP were efficacious for MCSM patients with DCS. While ACDF could improve cervical lordosis and alleviate neck pain more effectively, it can also result in cervical sagittal imbalance and decreased mobility. Furthermore, the recovery from LP was superior to that from ACDF for patients with reserving space. In contrast, the recovery from both decompression techniques was comparable for individuals in non-reserving space.

What Happens to Sagittal Alignment Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are 2 sucessful posterior decompression techniques for cervical myelo-radiculopathy. There is also a growing body of evidence describing the importance of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and its importance in outcomes. We investigated the difference between pre- and postoperative CSA parameters in and between LF or LP. Furthermore, we studied predictive variables associated with change in cervical mismatch (CM). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with cervical myeloradiculopathy in a single healthcare system. The primary outcomes are intra- and inter-cohort comparison of LF versus LP radiographic parameters at pre- and postoperative time points. A secondary multivariable analysis of predictive factors was performed evaluating factors predicting postoperative CM. RESULTS: Eighty nine patients were included; 38 (43%) had LF and 51 (57%) underwent LP. Both groups decreased in lordosis (LF 11.4° vs. 4.9°, P = 0.01; LP 15.2° vs. 9.1°, P < 0.001), increased in cSVA (LF 3.4 vs. 4.2 cm, P = 0.01; LP 3.2 vs. 4.2 cm, P < 0.001), and increased in CM (LF 22.0° vs. 28.5°, P = 0.02; LP 16.8° vs. 22.3°, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the postoperative CSA between groups. No significant predictors of change in pre- and postoperative CM were found. CONSLUSIONS: There were no significant pre-or postoperative differences following the 2 procedures, suggesting radiographic equipoise in well indicated patients. Across all groups, lordosis decreased, cSVA increased, and cervical mismatch increased. There were no predictive factors that led to change in cervical mismatch.

What is the Preferable Method for the C3 and C7 Segments in Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients Diagnosed with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

BACKGROUND: Traditional C3-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (UOLP) often leads to various postoperative complications as a result of damage of cervical posterior muscles and nuchal ligaments. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate postoperative outcomes after our modified UOLP versus traditional UOLP in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: Seventy-six patients with MCSM who underwent the modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy (40 patients) or traditional C3-C7 UOLP (36 patients) were included. Preoperative and postoperative cervical radiologic parameters, as well as clinical and surgical outcomes, were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperatively, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores improved significantly more in the modified UOLP group than in the traditional UOLP group (P = 0.028), whereas visual analog scale scores and Neck Disability Index improved similarly in both groups. Follow-up scores for Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope increased in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group and were unchanged in the modified UOLP group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group. The modified UOLP group lost less cervical posterior muscle area compared with the traditional UOLP group (3.72% ± 3.54% vs. 6.67% ± 2.81%; P < 0.001). The range of motion in the modified UOLP group was significantly greater than in the traditional UOLP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Also, the modified UOLP group experienced a notable reduction in operative time, blood loss volume, and postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend performing our modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy instead of traditional C3-C7 UOLP.

Incidence and Risk Factors for the Development of Axial Symptoms Following Posterior Single-Door Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior single-door laminoplasty is a widely practiced clinical procedure, but the occurrence of postoperative axial syndrome (AS) remains a significant concern. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with AS and develop a risk prediction model. METHODS: Clinical data from 226 patients who underwent posterior single-door laminoplasty between June 2017 and June 2022 were collected. Through Logistic model analysis, the risk factors of AS are clarified and the intensity of each risk factor is explained in the form of forest plot. Subsequently, we constructed a predictive model and plotted receiver operating characteristic curves to assess the model's predictive value. RESULTS: In the end, 87 cases were diagnosed with AS, resulting in an incidence rate of 38.5%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative encroachment rate of anterior spinal canal (pre-op ERASC), intraoperative facet joints destruction, intraoperative open-door angle, postoperative loss of cervical curvature, and postoperative loss of cervical range of motion were independent risk factors for AS. Conversely, preoperative cervical curvature (pre-op CC) and postoperation early function training were protective factors against AS. The Youden index indicated that the cutoff values for pre-op ERASC and pre-op CC were 26.6°and 16.5, respectively. The risk prediction model for AS was constructed and a nomogram was plotted. The model has high clinical value. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-op ERASC, pre-op CC, intraoperative facet joints destruction, intraoperative open-door angle, postoperative loss of cervical curvature, postoperative loss of cervical range of motion, and postoperation early function training are independent influencing factors for AS occurrence. The risk model has good practicability.

Postoperative Changes of Spinopelvic Sagittal Parameters After Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To investigate postoperative changes of spinopelvic sagittal parameters after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) accompanying postoperative cervical kyphotic deformity or cervical regional sagittal imbalance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the best of our knowledge, no study has been reported concerning postoperative changes of spinopelvic sagittal parameters accompanying postoperative deterioration of cervical sagittal alignment or balance after cervical laminoplasty. METHODS: Forty-five CSM patients without preoperative cervical kyphosis who underwent laminoplasty were included. None of the 45 patients had a medical history of previous spine surgery, hip joint surgery, or knee joint surgery. The patients were divided into 2 groups (kyphosis and lordosis groups) according to postoperative C2-7 angle, and they were also divided into 2 other groups (imbalance and balance groups) according to postoperative C1-7 sagittal vertical axis. Postoperative changes (Δ) of T1 slope (T1S), thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), Pelvic tilt, and C7 sagittal vertical axis were measured comparing lateral radiographs of the whole spine in the standing position taken at 1 year postoperatively with those before surgery. RESULTS: Both T1S and TLK significantly decreased after cervical laminoplasty in the kyphosis group compared with the lordosis group. On the other hand, both T1S and TLK increased significantly, and LL significantly decreased after surgery in the imbalance group compared with the balance group. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year after laminoplasty for CSM, both T1S and TLK significantly decreased accompanying postoperative cervical kyphotic deformity as a compensatory action for postoperative cervical kyphosis to maintain the global sagittal balance of the spine, whereas both T1S and TLK increased significantly, and LL significantly decreased accompanying postoperative cervical reginal sagittal imbalance which resulted in postoperative forward inclination of the whole spine.

Laminoplasty in Motion: Evolving Techniques and Complications.

Cervical laminoplasty is an increasingly popular surgical option for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Over the past few decades, there have been substantial developments in both surgical technique and hardware options. As the field of cervical surgery rapidly evolves, there is a timely need to reassess the evolving complications associated with newer techniques. This review aims to synthesize the available literature on cervical laminoplasty and associated mechanical complications pertaining to different laminoplasty hinge fixation options.

An innovative approach to assess spinal canal expansion following French-door cervical laminoplasty by intraoperative ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of applying intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) to evaluate spinal canal expansion in patients undergoing French-door cervical laminoplasty (FDCL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients who underwent FDCL for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy were prospectively recruited. Formulae describing the relationship between laminoplasty opening angle (LOA) and laminoplasty opening size, the increase in sagittal canal diameter and the spinal canal area were deduced with trigonometric functions. The LOA was measured with IOUS imaging during surgery, and other spinal canal parameters were assessed. Actual spinal canal enlargement was verified on postoperative CT images. Linear correlation analysis and Bland‒Altman analysis were used to evaluate correlation and agreement between the intraoperative and postoperative measurements. RESULTS: The LOA at C5 measured with IOUS was 27.54 ± 3.12°, and it was 27.23 ± 3.02° on postoperative CT imaging. Linear correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between IOUS and postoperative CT measurements (r = 0.88; p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between these two methods, with a mean difference of 0.30°. For other spinal canal expansion parameter measurements, correlation analysis showed a moderate to a high degree of correlation (p < 0.01), and Bland-Altman analysis indicated good agreement. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, during the French-door cervical laminoplasty procedure, application of IOUS can accurately evaluate spinal canal expansion. This innovative method may be helpful in improving surgical accuracy by enabling the operator to measure and determine canal enlargement during surgery, leading to ideal clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The use of intraoperative ultrasonography to assess spinal canal expansion following French-door cervical laminoplasty may improve outcomes for patients undergoing this procedure by providing more accurate measurements of spinal canal expansion. KEY POINTS: • Spinal canal expansion after French-door cervical laminoplasty substantially influences operative prognosis; insufficient or excessive lamina opening may result in unexpected outcomes. • Prediction of spinal canal expansion during surgery was previously impracticable, but based on this study, intraoperative ultrasonography offers an innovative approach and strongly agrees with postoperative CT measurement. • Since this is the first research to offer real-time canal expansion guidance for cervical laminoplasty, it may improve the accuracy of the operation and produce ideal clinical outcomes with fewer postoperative complications.

Clinical outcome of surgical management of mild cervical compressive myelopathy based on minimum clinically important difference.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM), caused by cervical spondylosis (cervical spondylotic myelopathy [CSM]) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), is a common neurological disorder in the elderly. For moderate/severe CCM, surgical management has been the first-line therapeutic option. Recently, surgical management is also recommended for mild CCM, and a few studies have reported the surgical outcome for this clinical population. Nonetheless, the present knowledge is insufficient to determine the specific surgical outcome of mild CCM. PURPOSE: To examine the surgical outcomes of mild CCM while considering the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent subaxial cervical surgery for CCM caused by CSM and OPLL between 2013 and 2022 were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score) was employed as the clinical outcomes. Based on previous reports, the JOA score threshold to determine mild myelopathic symptoms was set at ≥14.5 points, and the MCID of the JOA score for mild CCM was set at 1 point. METHODS: The patients with a JOA score of ≥14.5 points at baseline were stratified into the mild CCM and were examined while considering the MCID. The mild CCM cohort was dichotomized into the improvement group, including the patients with an achieved MCID (JOA score ≥1 point) or with a JOA score of 17 points (full mark) at 1 year postoperatively, and the nonimprovement group, including the others. Demographics, symptomatology, radiographic findings, and surgical procedure were compared between the two groups and studied using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Of 335 patients with CCM, 43 were stratified into the mild CCM cohort (mean age, 58.5 years; 62.8% male). Among them, 25 (58.1 %) patients were assigned to the improvement group and 18 (41.9 %) were assigned to the nonimprovement group. The improvement group was significantly younger than the nonimprovement group; however, other variables did not significantly differ. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff point of the patient's age to discriminate between the improvement and nonimprovement groups was 58 years with an area under the curve of 0.702 (p=.015). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the majority of patients with mild CCM experienced improvement reaching the MCID of JOA score at 1 year postoperatively. The present study suggests that for younger patients with mild CCM, especially those aged below 58 years, subjective neurological recovery is more likely to be obtained. Meanwhile, the surgery takes on a more prophylactic significance to halt disease progression for older patients. The results of this study can help in the decision-making process for this clinical population.

Comparative effectiveness and functional outcome of C3 & C7 dome-hybrid open-door laminoplasty with traditional unilateral open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The C3 & C7 dome-hybrid open-door laminoplasty was proven to be an effective treatment for multi-levels cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, its superiority over traditional unilateral open-door laminoplasty (UOLP) remains questionable, and no studies have compared the efficacy of this technique with traditional UOLP. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of C3 & C7 dome-hybrid open-door laminoplasty with traditional UOLP in treating multi-levels CSM. METHODS: A retrospective study of multi-levels CSM with laminoplasty was performed, including 35 cases of traditional UOLP and 27 cases of C3 & C7 dome-hybrid open-door laminoplasty. Radiographic evaluation parameters and clinical outcomes were recorded to evaluate the surgical effectiveness. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic baseline parameters. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 Cobb angle of the modified group was significantly greater than that of the traditional group (p = 0.026). Meanwhile, the C2-C7 SVA of the modified group was significantly smaller than that of the traditional group (p = 0.009). Clinical outcomes such as VAS, NDI, and SF-12 scores, improved significantly in the modified group compared to the traditional group, while the JOA scores had no significant difference in both groups. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Both techniques have satisfactory outcomes in treating multi-levels CSM. Comparing with traditional UOLP, C3 & C7 dome-hybrid open-door laminoplasty has a greater superiority in reducing postoperative neck pain and maintaining the cervical sagittal alignment. It is proven to be a feasible management for patients with multi-levels CSM.

Plate-only open-door laminoplasty is associated with durable, significantly improved clinical outcomes and a very low reoperation rate for progressive spondylosis or adjacent segment disease: average 8-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Multilevel cervical myelopathy is a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults. Surgical intervention via laminoplasty can provide satisfactory clinical outcomes by expansive decompression of the spinal cord. Traditional suture or bone graft techniques have been associated with insufficient fixation, leading to premature closure and subsequent neurological deterioration. In contrast, plated laminoplasty has been shown to provide stable fixation to maintain canal enlargement, but longer-term outcomes are lacking. PURPOSE: To evaluate longer-term clinical outcomes and reoperations associated with plate-only open-door laminoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Postoperative patients who underwent plate-only open door laminoplasty with minimum 5-year follow up. OUTCOME MEASURES: modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). METHODS: All patients at a single academic institution who underwent plate-only open-door cervical laminoplasty from 9/1/2006 to 9/1/2016 were identified to ensure minimum 5 year follow up. Clinical outcomes included the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The occurrence of any repeat operations on the cervical spine was evaluated, as well as its cause. The study team attempted to contact all eligible patients to achieve at least 5 years postoperative follow-up. Pairwise t tests were performed to compare clinical outcomes at preoperative, 6 months, 1-year, and final postoperative follow-up with an α level of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 774 met the initial inclusion criteria, of which 157 were included in the study (20.3%). Most common reasons for exclusion included inability to reach after 3 attempts (49.48%), inactive phone numbers (20.28%), and patient declining (3.49%). Included patients had an average age of 60.66±10.63 and an average follow-up time of 8.37±2.57 years (minimum 5 years). mJOA scores (preoperative 11.59±2.16) improved significantly at 6-months (14.57±2.07, p<.001), 1-year (15.19±1.95, p<.001), and final follow-up (14.59±2.63, p<.001). NDI (preoperative 33.89±18.54) improved significantly at 6 months (27.89±19.72, p=.03), 1-year (25.96±19.79, p=.01) and final follow-up (17.88±17.17, p<.001). SF-12 MCS (preoperative 44.73) improved significantly at 6 months (52.01, p=.001), 1-year (51.62, p=.008), and final follow-up (52.32, p<.001). No patient underwent reoperations for plate failure or canal closure with recurrent stenosis. Reoperations for progressive spondylosis during the follow up period were rare and occurred in only three patients for new onset radiculopathy (1.9%) and two patients for myelopathy (1.3%) at an average of 3.2 years postoperative. There were no reoperations performed for adjacent segment disease. CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum of 5 years and an average of more than 8 years postoperative, laminoplasty was associated with significant and sustained improvements in mJOA, NDI, and SF-12 MCS. Importantly, no patients underwent revision surgery for plate failure or recurrent canal closure. Reoperations for new onset radiculopathy and myelopathy were also very rare over the 8-year average follow-up period, with no reoperations for adjacent segment disease. Plate-only laminoplasty is a durable means of treating multilevel myelopathy with excellent longer-term outcomes and a very low risk of reoperation, either for premature closure or the inevitable spondylotic changes that occur over time in patients with similar baseline characteristics to the study population.

Effects of Cervical Paravertebral Extensors in Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Grouped According to mK-Line.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to quantify the morphology, composition, and asymmetry of the paravertebral extensor muscles (PSEMs) in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who had different modified K-line (mK-line) and the minimum interval between the mK-line and OPLL (INTmin ) values and to investigate the relationship between PSEMs and symptoms and outcomes following laminoplasty. These original findings elucidated that the atrophy of PSEMs could predict decompression outcomes and provided a theoretical basis for paraspinal muscle rehabilitation. METHODS: A total of 94 consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for OPLL between January 2020 and January 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The relative cross-sectional areas (rCSA), functional cross-sectional areas (rFCSA), and FCSA/CSA ratio of the multifidus (MF), semispinalis cervicalis (SSCe), semispinalis capitis (SSCa), and splenius capitis (SpCa) were measured at the C3-C7 segments on cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study compared the differences between the mK-line (+) group and the mK-line (-) group, as well as between the INTmin <4 mm group and the INTmin ≥4 mm group, using the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the χ2 -test for categorical variables. The correlations between the PSEMs and symptoms were analyzed using either the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The relative total CSA (rTCSA) of the PSEMs, especially the MF, was significantly smaller in the mK-line (-) group. However, the FCSA/CSA of the right deep extensor muscle (DEM) was larger. The asymmetry of the MF TFCSA/TCSA showed a significant difference between the mK-line groups. In the INTmin <4 mm group, the PSEMs rCSA and rFCSA were significantly smaller, while the bilateral MF TFCSA/TCSA and right SSCe TFCSA/TCSA were larger. The asymmetry of the superficial extensor muscle rCSA was significantly lower in the group with INTmin <4 mm. The postoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA) and mJOA recovery rate were positively correlated with the INTmin and DEM rCSA and negatively correlated with the asymmetry of MF FCSA/CSA. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mK-line (-) or INTmin <4 mm, the PSEMs were smaller, and the DEM atrophy and composition changes were predominant. The MF asymmetry was higher in patients with mK-lines (-), whereas the SEM atrophy and asymmetry were more prevalent in patients with INTmin <4 mm. The DEM was related to the preoperative and postoperative mJOA scores. DEM-preserving surgery or DEM-specific rehabilitation exercises can improve the recovery of patients with OPLL during the perioperative period. In addition, attention should be paid to the evaluation of the SEM, especially the SpCa at the C3 and C5 levels.

The clinical efficacy of laminectomy fusion fixation and posterior single open-door laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To compared the clinical efficacy of two surgical methods, posterior laminectomy fusion fixation, and posterior single open-door laminoplasty, in treating multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: The study retrospectively included 102 patients treated between December 2016 and December 2020. The patients were included into an observation group (56 cases) treated with total laminectomy and lateral screw fixation, and a control group (46 cases) treated with single open-door laminoplasty. RESULTS: After 24 months, both groups showed significant improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, indicating better clinical symptoms and functional recovery. There was no significant difference in preoperative JOA and VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 24 months after surgery, there was no significant difference in JOA and VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the observation group had a significantly higher cervical curvature index (CCI) and lower range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The CCI in control group was lower than before surgery, while the CCI in observation group was higher than before surgery, and CCI in the control group was considerably lower than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The complication rate was lower in the control group, with fewer cases of axial symptoms, fifth cervical nerve root palsy, and overall complications. The overall complication rate was 25.0% (14/56) in the observation group and 10.8% (5/46) in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both posterior laminectomy fusion fixation and posterior single open-door laminoplasty yield positive outcomes in improving clinical neurological function, cervical curvature, range of motion of the cervical spine, and cervical sagittal balance. Although open-door laminoplasty is less effective than total laminectomy in maintaining CCI and sagittal balance, it excels in preserving cervical range of motion, less surgical trauma and complications. Thus, open-door laminoplasty may be a suitable first-choice treatment for multi-segmental cervical OPLL, especially for patients with lordotic cervical spine physiological curvature.

Analysis of risk factors for axial symptoms after posterior cervical open-door laminoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Laminoplasty (LP), a procedure commonly used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), often results in the development of axial symptoms (AS) postoperatively. This study aims to analyze the risk factors associated with the occurrence of AS after LP. METHODS: We collected and evaluated clinical data from 264 patients with CSM who underwent LP treatment at our institution from January 2018 to January 2022 through a single-center retrospective study. Of the patients, 153 were male and 111 were female, with an average age of 58.1 ± 6.7 years. All patients underwent C3-7 posterior laminoplasty. Based on the occurrence of postoperative axial symptoms, the patients were divided into an AS group and a non-AS group. General information, including age, gender, disease duration, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, postoperation early function training, and collar-wearing time, was recorded and compared between the two groups. Surgical-related data, such as operative segments, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative facet joint destruction, and destruction of the C7 spinous process muscle insertion, were also compared. Imaging data, including preoperative cervical curvature, cervical range of motion, preoperative encroachment rate of the anterior spinal canal, and angle of laminar opening, were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for the development of AS after LP, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to explore the optimal preoperative parameters. RESULTS: All 264 patients successfully underwent surgery and were followed up for an average of 19.5 ± 6.8 months. At the 6-month follow-up, 117 patients were diagnosed with AS, resulting in an incidence rate of 40.2%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that preoperative encroachment rate of anterior spinal canal (Pre-op ERASC), intraoperative facet joints destruction (Intra-op FJD), intraoperative open-door angle (Intra-op OA), destroy the C7 spinous process muscle insertion (Destroy C7 SPMI), postoperative loss of cervical curvature (Post-op LCC), and postoperative loss of cervical range of motion (Post-op LCROM) were independent risk factors for AS. Conversely, preoperative cervical curvature (Pre-op CC) and postoperation early function training (Post-op EFT) were protective factors against AS. According to the ROC curve, the cutoff values for preoperative anterior spinal canal occupation rate and preoperative cervical curvature were 28.5% and 16.5°, respectively. When the preoperative anterior spinal canal occupation rate was greater than 28.5% or the preoperative cervical curvature was less than 16.5°, AS was more likely to occur after surgery. CONCLUSION: High preoperative anterior spinal canal occupation rate, facet joint damage during surgery, C7 spinous process muscle stop point damage, larger angle of laminar opening, and greater postoperative cervical curvature loss and cervical range of motion loss are associated with an increased risk of developing AS after cervical laminoplasty. Conversely, a larger preoperative cervical curvature and early postoperative functional exercises can help reduce the occurrence of AS.

[The clinical efficacy of posterior cervical open-door expansive laminoplasty combined with Key-hole technique for the treatment of mixed cervical spondylosis].

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of posterior cervical open-door expansive laminoplasty combined with Key-hole technique in treating mixed cervical spondylosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study. A retrospective analysis was made of 128 cases of mixed cervical spondylosis with symptoms of spinal cord and nerve root compression and complete follow-up data admitted to the Department of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from January 2016 to June 2022. Of the patients, there were 90 males and 38 females with a mean age of (58.5±9.8) years. Before February 2018, 72 cases were treated with posterior cervical open-door expansive laminoplasty (single-door group), and after February 2018, 56 cases were treated with posterior cervical open-door expansive laminoplasty combined with Key-hole technique (combined group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain and Cobb angle of imaging before operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative JOA score, VAS score and Cobb angle of imaging were compared between the two groups. Results: Both groups of patients successfully completed the operation. Operation time [M(Q1, Q3)]: 89.0 (68.5, 104.5) min in the single-door group and 90.0 (72.8, 108.8) min in the combined group, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.640). The intraoperative blood loss in the single-door group was 100 (100, 200) ml, and it was 100(100, 200) ml in the combined group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.680). Postoperative JOA scores increased significantly, while VAS scores decreased significantly in both groups. At the last follow-up, the JOA and VAS scores of the combined group were better than those of the single-door group (both P<0.05). Conclusion: The posterior cervical open-door expansive laminoplasty combined with Key-hole technique for the treatment of mixed cervical spondylosis can effectively remove the compression on the cervical spine without causing cervical instability.

Optimal Treatment of C3 Lamina in Cervical Laminoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Results of C4-C6 laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy and C3-C6 laminoplasty were compared retrospectively. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the difference between C3 laminectomy and C3 laminoplasty in cervical laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative damage to the semispinalis cervicis has been shown to lead to postoperative axial symptoms and reduced range of motion (ROM). To prevent this event, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is considered superior to C3 laminoplasty. METHODS: A total of 36 patients were included in this study: 20 patients (GroupA) of C3 laminectomy, C4-C6 laminoplasty compared with 16 patients (GroupB) of C3-C6 laminoplasty. We collected patient's background data, operative time, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, VAS score, and radiologic findings such as C2-C7 Cobb angle, ROM, C2 inter-spinous angle, and use of postoperative PRN medication were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the C2-C7 Cobb angles between the 2 groups before and after surgery (P = 0.315). In ROM, there was a 17.7% decrease from 31.5 preoperatively to 25.9 postoperatively in Group A, and a 6.1% decrease from 29.3 preoperatively to 27.5 postoperatively in Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in ROM (P = 0.683). Postoperative neck pain (VAS) was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B both at 1 week (P = 0.015) and 1 month (P = 0.035) after surgery. The C2 inter-spinous angle was statistically significantly smaller in Group A than in Group B (P = 0.004). Clinical outcomes and surgical outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: If the C2 interspinous angle is wide and intraoperative semispinalis capitis damage can be minimized, it is worth trying C3 laminoplasty, but if the C2 inter-spinous angle is narrow, C3 laminectomy is recommended from the beginning.

Axial Symptoms After Conventional and Modified Laminoplasty: A Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The study aims to evaluate the impact of procedural variations in single-door laminoplasty on axial symptoms (AS) and neurologic outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, adhering to specific inclusion criteria. We extracted data on the prevalence of AS in both the modified and conventional laminoplasty groups from the selected studies. Neurologic outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) recovery rate, which was subsequently converted to Hedge's g for analysis. Forest plots were generated to visualize the effect sizes, and publication bias was assessed using both funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Fourteen studies comprising 1201 patients were included in this meta-analysis focused on AS. The aggregated SMD was -0.891 with a 95% CI of -1.146 to -0.631 (P < 0.01), denoting a statistically significant reduction in AS in the modified laminoplasty group compared with the conventional approach. Of the 14 studies, 10, encompassing 898 patients, contributed data for JOA recovery rate analysis. The overall effect size was 0.089, with a 95% CI ranging from -0.090 to 0.267, and a P value of 0.2901, indicating no significant difference in neurologic outcomes between the 2 techniques. No evidence of publication bias was detected. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that modified laminoplasty is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of axial symptoms, without compromising neurologic functionality.